Integer arithmetic from a computer point of view
A thing that is often overlooked is the way arithmetic operations work in a computer and specifically in the processing unit: not having a clear idea of how the operations are performed and their limitations can cause very important bugs to happen and also help in case you want to reverse unknown code.
In this I will explore how operation on integers (floating point will be treated in a specific, future, post).
Integer encoding
We are interested of the case of a register containing a number: since
the arithmetic inside a CPU is done on registers via the ALU
and
since the registers are size limited, all the
arithmetic operations are intended modulo the size of the registers:
so if \(N\) is the number of bits of the registers we can
only represent (directly) unsigned values between \(0\) and \(2^N  1\).
Note: there is a tricky part about the representation of numbers, i.e.
The formula is the following
$$ b = \sum_{i = 0}^{N  1} b_i 2^i $$
Remember the following properties for binary numbers: completness
$$ \sum_{n = 0}^{N} 2^n = 2^{N + 1}  1 $$
and shifting  multiplication relation
$$ \eqalign{ 2\cdot2^N &= 2^N + 2^N \cr &= 2^N + \sum_{i = 0}^{N  1} 2^i + 1 \cr &= 2^N + 2^{N  1} + 2^{N  2} + \dots + 2^1 + 2^0 + 1 \cr &= \sum_{i = 0}^N 2^i + 1 \cr &= 2^{N + 1}  1 + 1 \cr &= 2^{N + 1} \cr } $$
that means that left shifting a binary number is equivalent to multiplying the same number for a power of two (I know, I know, this is obvious).
For signed numbers there is not a unique way to represent them: the quick and dirty way would be to use the most significant bit as sign bit but this has the drawback to have two zeros.
I think that this encoding is not used by anyone in the real world (but I could be wrong), there are more efficient ways.
One's complement
It consists in flipping all the bits of a number, in this way if you define the negative of a given number as the one's complement of it you have the nice property that this two numbers summed are equal to zero. However you have to add one to a subtraction to obtain the correct result
$$ \hbox{one}(x) = 2^N  x $$
$$ x = \hbox{one}(x) + 1 $$
The problem is that you have two zeros: all bits equal to zero and all equal to one.
Two's complement
It's an extension of the one's complement: to obtain the negative representation of a number you have to take the one's complement and add one: in this way you have an asymmetry between the minimum and maximum number that can be represented, i.e. you can represent values between \(2^{N  1}\) and \(2^{N  1}  1\). For example with 7 bits you have the interval \((64, 63)\).
$$ w =  a_{N  1}\, 2^{N  1} + \sum_{i = 0}^{N  2} a_i\,2^i $$
Normally in the code is this the way the negative numbers are represented.
Mind blowing realization is that the two's complement of the lowest integer is itself:
$$ \hbox{two}\left(\tt 0x10000000\right) = {\tt 0x01111111} + 1 = {\tt 0x10000000} $$
Remember that a value into a register is not signed or unsigned by itself, it depends on how is used in the code.
In two's complement representation INT_MIN
is less than INT_MAX
.
Negation may overflow for signed arithmetic
Operations
We have a representation of numbers in binary that can handle unsigned and signed, but we need to do math with them and we have to manage the limits of having a fixed bit width but at the end of the day is not impossible in practice.
Addition
The simplest operation is the addition: we simply use the rules from the normal math but since we have a fixed number of bits we cannot sum two number and have the result in a register with the same number of bits, indeed if with \(N\) bits we can have as a maximum unsigned value \(2^N1\) if we sum itself we obtain
$$ \eqalign{ \hbox{max}_u(N) + \hbox{max}_u(N) &= 2^N  1 + \left(2^N  1\right) \cr &= 2\cdot2^N  2 \cr &= 2^{N+1}  2 \cr &= \hbox{max}_u(N + 1)  1 \cr } $$
i.e. is possible, with one bit more, to represent more numbers that is possible to obtain (think for example in a register with width 4bit, you have 7 has a maximum unsigned number, so the maximum result of a sum for this case is 14 that is less that 15, the maximum unsigned possible with 5 bits).
Subtraction
Thanks to the two's complement representation, it is possible to do subtraction in the same way we can do normally in arithmetics, i.e. \(a  b = a + \left(b\right)\) that can be translated as \( a  b = a + \hbox{two}(b) = a + \hbox{one}(b) + 1\).
The only thing not obvious is the carry flag: if you take for example the case where we subtract zero with itself, we obtain a carry although we shouldn't have it in a normal calculation.
Multiplication
Multiplication is straightforward as well, I mean, there are operations from a processor that implement that;
$$ \eqalign{ \hbox{max}_u(N)\cdot\hbox{max}_u(N) &= \left(2^N  1\right)\cdot\left(2^N  1\right) \cr &= 2^{2N}  2\cdot2^N + 1 \cr &= 2^{2N}  2^{N + 1} + 1 \cr &= 2^{2N}  1 + 1  2^{N + 1} + 1 \cr &= \hbox{max}_u(2N)  2^{N + 1} + 2\cr &= \hbox{max}_u(2N)  \left(2^{N + 1}  2\right)\cr &= \hbox{max}_u(2N)  2\cdot\left(2^{N}  1\right)\cr &= \hbox{max}_u(2N)  2\cdot\hbox{max}_u(N)\cr } $$
so we can contain a result for sure if we use two registers for the destination (like the x86
does
with the mul
operation).
If we take two 4bit number and we multiply them together we obtain as maximum result \(15\cdot15 = 225\)
Division
This operation is straightforward as well, the only consideration to add is that here we are handling fixed precision (integer) numbers and in the general case dividing two integers can result in not integer numbers.
To clarify the point we need some terminology
$$ {\hbox{dividend}\over\hbox{divisor}} \rightarrow \hbox{dividend} = \hbox{quotient}\times\hbox{divisor} + \hbox{remainder} $$
Since we cannot divide with numbers less than one (generally dividing by zero raise an exception) this means that the quotient cannot be greater than the dividend, so a register can contain all the possible results; moreover, usually another register is used to store the remainder of the operation (that can be seen as the result of the \(\mod \hbox{divisor}\) operation).
Note that to use division, the following condition MUST apply (source)
(b != 0) && (!((a == INT32_MIN) && (b == 1)))
in particular, on x86
this leads to the raising of a SIGFPE
signal.
Sign extension
In certain cases could be necessary to do operations between numbers having a different
number of bits; if these numbers are unsigned it's not big deal, but if instead we having
signed ones we have to sign extend i.e. to complete the bits of the extended number
with all 1
s.
Let me make an example: if we have a 8bit register with the decimal value \(16\),
its representation with two's complement will be 0xef
; now, if we want to put this
value into a 16bit register and represent the same number, we have to set as most significant
byte 0xff
, i.e. 0xffef
: this because of a nice property of binary numbers, namely
in our case we have the Mth bit used for the sign and suppose we have other \(s\) bits
$$ \eqalign{ 2^M + \sum_{i=s}^{M1} 2^i + \sum_{i=0}^{s  1} 2^i &=  1 \cr 2^M + \sum_{i=s}^{M  1} 2^i &= \sum_{i=0}^{s  1} 2^i  1 \cr 2^M + \sum_{i=s}^{M  1} 2^i &= 2^{s}  1 } $$
$$ \eqalign{ \left(2^N + 2^{N  1} + 2^{N  2} + \dots + 2^s\right)  \left(2^s\right) &= 2^N + 2^{N  1} + 2^{N  2} + \dots + 2^s + 2^s \cr &= 2^N + 2^{N  1} + 2^{N  2} + \dots + 2^s + \left[\left(\sum_{i = 0}^{s  1}2^i\right) + 1\right] \cr &= 2^N + 2^{N  1} + 2^{N  2} + \dots + 2^s + 2^{s  1} + 2^{s  2} + \dots + 2 + 2^0 + 1 \cr &= 2^N + \sum_{i = 0}^{N  1} 2^i + 1 \cr &= 2^N + 2^N  1 + 1 \cr &= 0 \cr } $$
Some architectures have direct instructions to do that, like the movxs in x86, other instead use multiple operations to do the same
Flags
It's all fine and good but as already said, we have a limited number of bits
to represent numbers, so it's possible that some operations couldn't be done
correctly: for example, if you want to sum, in a 8bitsregister 0xff
to
any other number, you can't fit the result in the register, you should have
one bit more; for this reason in a CPU you have also some flags (i.e. onebit
values) usually contained in an unique register to indicate some particular
properties of the last arithmetic operation. Take in mind that not all
architectures have it.
Each system has its own nomenclature and specific flags, but I think the minimal set is composed of the following
Carry flag (CF)
Used in unsigned numbers to indicate that the result doesn't fit in the register; for an addition is pretty clear what that means, for a subtraction is a little tricky since this flag can be used for this operation as borrow flag (see wikipedia).
There are two schools of thoughts: some architectures (like x86
) use the borrow
bit, others (like ARM
) use the carry and the relation \( (a  b) = a + \hbox{not}(b) + 1\).
Overflow flag (OF)
Used for signed numbers to indicate that the resulting sign bit is not coherent with the correct result; for example with 4bit (binary) numbers we can have the following four cases:
$$ \eqalign{ 0100 + 0100 &= 1000 \quad\hbox{overflow} \cr 1000 + 1000 &= 0000 \quad\hbox{overflow} \cr 0100 + 0001 &= 0101 \quad\hbox{no overflow} \cr 1100 + 1100 &= 1000 \quad\hbox{no overflow} \cr } $$
It's important to stress that the OF
doesn't indicate an overflow into the sign
bit, but that the sign bit is wrong: in the last example above you can see that although
there is a carry bit into the sign bit, at the end of the calculation the sign is right.
If you want a more in deep explanation, this post
about the OF
of the 6502's ALU
is amazing.
Zero flag (ZF)
The last operation resulted in a result equal to zero, like subtracting two registers containing
the same value or doing the logical and
operation between two registers having both zero as value.
Sign flag (SF)
This indicates that the result of the last operation is negative
Flow control
At the end of the day the flags are used primarly to do the so called flow control that in
high level languages is implemented via if
, while
, for
, etc...
Each architecture implements this with some particular couple of family of instructions: one family to
set the flag, like cmp
and test
, and another to jump to a particular location depending on the
particular values the flags have, like jmp
, jne
, jnz
and so on in x86
or b
,
bne
, ble
etc... in ARM
.
Take in mind that in an instruction like cmp arg1, arg2
is arg2
that is subtracted from arg1
.
For an unsigned comparison is sufficient to look at the CF
to understand if a number is greater
than another. As convention the terms above and below are used in the related jump.
For a signed number it's trickier: the greater condition is achieved if the sign bit is not set and no overflow happened (i.e. the sign bit is consistent) or if the sign bit is set (i.e. the number is negative) and the overflow happened (making the sign bit wrong). As convention the terms greater and *less are used in the related jump.
For the equal condition is sufficient to check the ZF
.
Description  Type  Flags 

>  unsigned (above)  CF == 1 
signed (greater)  (ZF == 0) && (SF==OF) 

==  any  ZF == 1 
Arithmetics in the C language
Our discussion is about how processors consume numbers but obvioulsy you usually
write code in some highlevel language like C
and this presents with the problem
of how the variables we declare in the code are "translated" into assembly language
by the compiler and how the different operations between variables interact with each
other (taking into consideration also that generally you have variables of different
size and "signess").
If you want a really deep dive into this kind of stuff, you need to read "The art of software security assessment", in particular chapter 6.
First of all you have a finite number of type: char, integer and floating point. We have to add the sign/unsigned type for the first twos.
Each type has its own bitwidth and generally are "classified" following the scheme below
Type  ILP32  ILP32LL  LP64  ILP64  LLP64 

char 
8  8  8  8  8 
short 
16  16  16  16  16 
int 
32  32  32  64  32 
long 
32  32  64  64  32 
long long 
?  64  64  64  64 
pointer 
32  32  64  64  64 
(obviously the ILP
stands for "integer", "long", "pointer" and LL
stands for "long long").
Note how in all the systems the char
is supposed to be 8bit wide.
C Language's constructs
It's important to be aware of the terminology: source An rvalue is the value of an expression, such as \(2\), or \((x + 3)\) , or \((x + y) * (a  b)\) . rvalues are not storage space
An lvalue is an expression that describes the location of an object used in the program. The location of the object is the object's lvalue, and the object's rvalue is the value stored at the location described by the lvalue.
Type conversions
Here we have the interesting and useful stuffs
value preserving: when the conversion allow to represent all the possible value of the starting type otherwise is called value changing.
The so called integer conversion rank (source) (note that different rank doesn't imply different width of its representation)
long long int , unsigned long long int

long int , unsigned long int

int , unsigned int

short int , unsigned short int

signed char , char , unsigned char

_Bool 
usual arithmetic conversions: when an operator needs two integer operands, first check either are floating point, otherwise starts the following procedure
 integer promotions: any type with rank lower than integer is promoted to integer
as described by the C11 6.3.1.1 rule (source here)
if an int can represent all values of the original type (as restricted by the width, for a bitfield), the value is converted to an int; otherwise, it is converted to an unsigned int. These are called the integer promotions.
at this point if the two operands are of the same type then we stop since there is no problem to do the operation, otherwise we need to take into consideration some factors
 same sign, different rank: the narrower type is converted to the wider
 rank(unsigned) >= rank(signed): convert to unsigned type

rank(unsigned) < rank(signed): there are two cases
 value preserving: convert both to the signed type
 value changing: convert both to the corresponding signed type of the unsigned operand
Literal declaration
From the previous section it's obvious that is important to understand precisely the type of a constant to avoid unexpected results; to declare the type of a literal the following suffixes are used

U
oru
forunsigned

L
orl
forlong

LL
orll
forlong long
Programmation errors
Out of bounds
Signedness
The signedness can cause two kind of bugs, one pretty logical, like the following where we suppose that
int n = read_some_n();
char buffer[1024];
if (n > 1024) { /* both are integer so no conversion */
return 1;
}
read(fd, buffer, n);/* here "n" is converted to size_t, i.e. unsigned */
Take in mind that modern operating systems can have some measure to avoid
catastrophic event like that, from the man page of read(2)
:
On Linux, read() (and similar system calls) will transfer at most
0x7ffff000 (2,147,479,552) bytes, returning the number of bytes actually
transferred. (This is true on both 32bit and 64bit sys‐ tems.)
This avoid that negative numbers casted to size_t
can cause harm.
Overflow
Wrap
The following piece of code run indefinetly
int count = 10;
while(count >= 0U)
fprintf(stdout, "%c", count);
Conversion
For example left shift <<
of variables with ranking less than integers are
converted to signed integers also in the case they were unsigned so they
give unexpected result: for example in this code
uint8_t src = 0x80;
uint64_t dst = src << 24;
dst
will contain the value 0xffffffff80000000
since the sign bit is
"extended".
Undefined behaviour
Having an asymmetry between the size of the greatest positive and lowest negative in two's complement arithmetics
causes some particular behaviour to happen for some functions: take for example the abs()
one; this function
returns the positive version of (almost) any number, indeed what is the positive value of the lowest negative
possible in a given architecture (in two's complement arithmetics)? From the man page we can read that
Trying to take the absolute value of the most negative integer is not defined.
so the following
code is not doing what you would expect when is passed INT_MIN
as argument
#define MAX_VALUE 5000
char buffer[MAX_VALUE];
int arg1 = atoi(argv[1]);
if (abs(arg1) < MAX_VALUE) {
buffer[arg1] = arg2;
}
Links
 A common C integer shifting mistake
 The CARRY flag and OVERFLOW flag in binary arithmetic
 Intel x86 JUMP quick reference
 SEI CERT C Coding Standard
 Condition Codes 1: Condition Flags and Codes from ARM site
 Jumps, flags, and the CMP instruction
 The 6502 overflow flag explained mathematically
 Avoiding Overflow, Underflow, and Loss of Precision "The cardinal rule in numerical analysis is to avoid subtracting nearly equal numbers. The more nearly equal two numbers are, the more precision is lost in the subtraction"
 https://www.cs.utah.edu/~rajeev/cs3810/slides/381008.pdf
 https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/22410/howdoesdivisionoccurinourcomputers
 https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/IntegerOverflowBuiltins.html
 64Bit Programming Models: Why LP64?
Comments
Comments powered by Disqus